{"id":1237,"date":"2026-10-03T09:00:00","date_gmt":"2026-10-03T07:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/?p=1237"},"modified":"2026-08-26T21:01:22","modified_gmt":"2026-08-26T19:01:22","slug":"note-taking-methods-compared","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/note-taking-methods-compared\/","title":{"rendered":"Cornell, Outline, Mind Map: Note-Taking Methods Compared"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Your notes are the first draft of your study system \u2014 the raw material every other technique acts on. Yet most notes are built by muscle memory rather than choice: a page of near-verbatim text copied because that is what the last notes looked like. The evidence, and the practical experience of top students, is that the <em>method<\/em> you choose shapes how much you understand and retain, not just how neat the page is. Here is how the big methods compare, and when to use each.<\/p>\n\n<p>Note-taking methods compared side by side reveal that the best system depends on your subject, your goals, and how you review.<\/p>\n\n\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n\n\n\n<nav class=\"table-of-contents\" aria-label=\"Table of Contents\"><p><strong>Table of Contents<\/strong><\/p><ul><li><a href=\"#the-core-question-what-are-notes-for\">The Core Question: What Are Notes For?<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#the-cornell-method-structure-for-recall\">The Cornell Method: Structure for Recall<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#the-outline-method-structure-for-order\">The Outline Method: Structure for Order<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#the-mind-map-structure-for-connections\">The Mind Map: Structure for Connections<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#the-charting-method-structure-for-comparison\">The Charting Method: Structure for Comparison<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#choosing-a-practical-decision-rule\">Choosing: A Practical Decision Rule<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#the-habit-that-matters-more-than-any-method\">The Habit That Matters More Than Any Method<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#note-taking-and-digital-tools\">Note-Taking and Digital Tools<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#common-note-taking-traps\">Common Note-Taking Traps<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav>\n\n<h2 id=\"the-core-question-what-are-notes-for\">The Core Question: What Are Notes For?<\/h2>\n<p>Notes have two different jobs, and the method that serves one can undermine the other:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Capture<\/strong> \u2014 faithfully recording what was covered, so nothing is lost.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Process<\/strong> \u2014 reorganizing the material in your own words so it is understood and later retrievable.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Almost all the popular methods trade off between these. Pure capture (transcription) loses the processing; forced-structure methods (Cornell) build processing in at the price of ease and pace. The best strategy is rarely to pick one method but to understand the trade-off so you choose deliberately \u2014 and, in practice, to prefer methods that build processing in, because notes that merely copy a lecture give you a transcript nobody ever studied.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"the-cornell-method-structure-for-recall\">The Cornell Method: Structure for Recall<\/h2>\n<p>Invented at Cornell, the method splits each page into three zones: a <strong>cue column<\/strong> on the left (for keywords and questions), a <strong>notes column<\/strong> on the right (the main content), and a <strong>summary strip<\/strong> at the bottom.<\/p>\n<p>The genius is that the layout <em>is<\/em> a study system:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>The cue column becomes a self-test: cover the notes column, and the cues are questions to answer from memory \u2014 built-in retrieval practice.<\/li>\n<li>The summary strip forces you to distill each page into one or two sentences \u2014 built-in elaboration.<\/li>\n<li>The split gives you a natural space for active recall without any separate tool.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Best for:<\/strong> lecture-heavy courses with clearly structured content, and for anyone who wants note-taking itself to double as studying.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Trade-off:<\/strong> the layout slows writing and needs discipline; it helps most when you actually return to the cues to self-test, and little if you merely file the pages.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"the-outline-method-structure-for-order\">The Outline Method: Structure for Order<\/h2>\n<p>The outline method mirrors content hierarchy with indentation: main points at the left margin, supporting points indented beneath, details further in. Because it follows the structure the speaker or text already provides, it is fast and keeps logical relationships visible.<\/p>\n<p>Its virtue is that it records <em>organization<\/em> as you go, so your notes already reflect how ideas relate \u2014 a head start on understanding. Its weakness is that it assumes the source has a clean hierarchy to outline; a meandering discussion or brainstorm collapses the structure, and an outline of a rambling lecture is a mess.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Best for:<\/strong> structured lectures, textbooks, and content that naturally flows as main-point\/sub-point.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Trade-off:<\/strong> fast and ordered, but can become passive transcription if you are not selective; it preserves the source&#8217;s structure but does not force you to connect it to what you already know.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"the-mind-map-structure-for-connections\">The Mind Map: Structure for Connections<\/h2>\n<p>A mind map radiates a central topic outward into branches: one central idea in the middle, main themes on thick branches, details on thinner twigs. It is a <em>network<\/em> recording rather than a list, and its strength is showing relationships, hierarchies, and lateral connections at a glance \u2014 the shape of the subject, not just its sequence.<\/p>\n<p>The mind map suits material where the whole point is the relationships: brainstorming, overviews, comparisons, and synthesis across a chapter. Because it is non-linear, it also handles digressions gracefully \u2014 an aside can attach anywhere without breaking the structure.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Best for:<\/strong> overviews, creative synthesis, revision maps, and subjects where connections matter more than sequence.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Trade-off:<\/strong> a full-page mind map is poor for dense sequential detail (formulas, citations), and building a good one takes deliberate thought; it is a thinking tool more than a capture tool.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"the-charting-method-structure-for-comparison\">The Charting Method: Structure for Comparison<\/h2>\n<p>Charting places the material in a table \u2014 rows for topics, columns for the aspects being compared (e.g., causes, symptoms, treatment, prognosis across several diseases). It is unmatched for comparative content, because the very act of choosing columns forces you to decide what dimensions matter and where the differences lie.<\/p>\n<p>When the material is naturally tabular \u2014 comparisons, classifications, timelines across concurrent streams \u2014 charting is the highest-yield method, because it both captures and analyses in one layout.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Best for:<\/strong> comparison-heavy material: medicine, history movements and their causes, comparative essays, categorizations.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Trade-off:<\/strong> less useful for narrative or argument-heavy content, and it requires you to know the dimensions in advance \u2014 an unfamiliar topic can be hard to chart on first pass.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"choosing-a-practical-decision-rule\">Choosing: A Practical Decision Rule<\/h2>\n<p>There is no universally best method, but there is a reliable decision rule:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Structure is the point \u2192 outline or chart.<\/strong> If the content is a clean hierarchy or a comparison, let that structure drive the note.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Connections are the point \u2192 mind map.<\/strong> If you are mapping relationships, synthesizing, or planning a response, mind-map it.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Self-testing is the point \u2192 Cornell.<\/strong> If the course rewards recall and you want active review built in, use the cue\/notes\/summary layout.<\/li>\n<li><strong>You are just capturing \u2192 beware.<\/strong> If you must capture verbatim, favor outline or Cornell over pure transcription, and process the notes soon afterward.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Most learners succeed with <strong>one primary method plus a fallback<\/strong>: Cornell for lectures, mind maps for revision, and charts for anything comparative. Choose by content, keep it intentional, and abandon method-purism in favor of what your material and your memory need.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"the-habit-that-matters-more-than-any-method\">The Habit That Matters More Than Any Method<\/h2>\n<p>Whatever layout you choose, one habit dominates every other factor: <strong>processing your notes within a day.<\/strong> The raw capture \u2014 in any method \u2014 decays fast; the reorganized, self-tested version is what actually sticks. Concretely, within 24 hours:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Convert cues into questions<\/strong> and answer them from memory (Cornell&#8217;s built-in step, or your own flashcard deck).<\/li>\n<li><strong>Distill each page into one line<\/strong> you could explain aloud \u2014 the summary that forces understanding.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Move the hardest, most testable items into a flashcard deck<\/strong> on a spaced schedule, so the note feeds the review system that keeps it alive.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>A tool like Flaaash fits this step naturally \u2014 you convert your processed notes or your source material into a deck, and spaced review then keeps every method&#8217;s output from decaying. Whichever layout you pick, the day-after processing and the spaced deck are where the real study happens.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"note-taking-and-digital-tools\">Note-Taking and Digital Tools<\/h2>\n<p>The choice between paper and digital is less about method than about what each enables in practice:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Handwritten paper<\/strong> forces slight summarization as you write (you cannot match a lecturer&#8217;s speed) and its non-linearity suits mind maps and charts; it is also better at reducing digital distraction. Its weakness is searchability and the ease of editing.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Digital notes<\/strong> are fast, searchable, editable, and can link notes together into a personal second-brain; but they invite verbatim transcription and distraction (the same device is your study tool and your social feed).<\/li>\n<li><strong>Hybrid, the pragmatic winner:<\/strong> hand-write for the processing step (structure, summary, understanding), then digitize the distilled outcomes \u2014 the one-line summaries and the deck-worthy items \u2014 so they are searchable and feed your review system.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The principle carries over: the <em>processing<\/em> is what matters, and the tool should serve it rather than fight it. If digital notes stay verbatim and unprocessed, they are a searchable transcript, not a study system; if paper notes stay raw, they are a dead file. Choose whichever you will actually process.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"common-note-taking-traps\">Common Note-Taking Traps<\/h2>\n<p>Beyond method choice, a few recurring traps quietly undermine even good notes:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>&#8220;Neatness as goal.&#8221;<\/strong> Beautiful, color-coded, unused notes are decorative, not studied. Polish only what you will actually revisit and test; time spent on beauty instead of processing is time lost.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Notes with no second pass.<\/strong> The single most common failure \u2014 notes taken, filed, never processed, and gone by exam week. The 24-hour processing habit is the antidote.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Copying the source structure exactly.<\/strong> Transcribing a textbook&#8217;s headings verbatim captures content but adds no understanding; restructuring in your own words, even imperfectly, builds the memory the structure alone cannot.<\/li>\n<li><strong>One giant blob per topic.<\/strong> Notes that are one unbroken wall of text give your eye nothing to anchor to. Force breaks \u2014 headings, cues, diagrams, tables \u2014 so the page has a retrievable shape.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Name these traps in your own notes and each is easy to steer around; the common thread is that they all substitute <em>activity<\/em> for the processing that actually produces learning.<\/p>\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-buttons is-content-justification-center is-layout-flex wp-container-core-buttons-is-layout-1 wp-block-buttons-is-layout-flex\">\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-button is-style-outline--1\"><a class=\"wp-block-button__link wp-element-button\" href=\"https:\/\/flaaash.app\">Try Flaaash Free<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-button is-style-outline--2\"><a class=\"wp-block-button__link wp-element-button\" href=\"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/list.html\">Start Learning<\/a><\/div>\n\n<\/div>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\">\n{\n  \"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\",\n  \"@type\": \"Article\",\n  \"headline\": \"Cornell, Outline, Mind Map: Note-Taking Methods Compared\",\n  \"description\": \"Note taking methods: science-backed guide. Learn how it works and how to apply it today with Flaaash, your AI learning app.\",\n  \"author\": {\n    \"@type\": \"Person\",\n    \"name\": \"Nicolas Veyret\"\n  },\n  \"publisher\": {\n    \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n    \"name\": \"Flaaash\",\n    \"logo\": {\n      \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n      \"url\": \"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/logo.png\"\n    }\n  },\n  \"datePublished\": \"2026-08-25\",\n  \"mainEntityOfPage\": \"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/note-taking-methods-compared\/\",\n  \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\"\n}\n<\/script>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\">\n{\n  \"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\",\n  \"@type\": \"FAQPage\",\n  \"mainEntity\": [\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Question\",\n      \"name\": \"Which note-taking method is the most effective?\",\n      \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n        \"text\": \"There is no single winner \\u2014 effectiveness depends on the material and your goal. Cornell is best for building self-testing into lecture notes, outline for ordered content, mind maps for connections and synthesis, and charting for comparisons. The deciding factor is the habit of processing notes within a day, whatever the layout.\"\n      }\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Question\",\n      \"name\": \"Is handwriting notes better than typing?\",\n      \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n        \"text\": \"For capture with processing, yes \\u2014 writing by hand tends to force summarization rather than verbatim transcription, and studies find handwriters often understand and remember more. But typed notes are faster and searchable. Many learners hybridize: hand-write for understanding, type for volume and retrieval.\"\n      }\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Question\",\n      \"name\": \"Do I need to take notes at all, or should I just pay attention?\",\n      \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n        \"text\": \"Pay attention and note the structure. Pure attention without notes leaves nothing to revisit or self-test; pure transcription leaves nothing understood. The value is in the selective, processed note \\u2014 enough to capture the shape and the hard parts, then reorganized and tested.\"\n      }\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Question\",\n      \"name\": \"How often should I return to my notes?\",\n      \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n        \"text\": \"At minimum, process them within 24 hours and review the resulting deck on a spaced schedule. Notes you never revisit are a transcript; notes that feed a spaced deck become the backbone of your memory.\"\n      }\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Question\",\n      \"name\": \"Can I use notes and flashcards together?\",\n      \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n        \"text\": \"Ideally, yes \\u2014 they are two stages of one system. Notes are the processed capture; the flashcards distilled from them are the spaced-retrieval machine. Converting your best notes into a deck (as Flaaash does from your materials) closes the loop between understanding and recall.\"\n      }\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Question\",\n      \"name\": \"How do I keep notes during a live lecture without falling behind?\",\n      \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n        \"text\": \"Use a capture-then-process split: take rough outline or shorthand notes during the lecture to keep pace, then invest the first 10\\u201315 minutes afterward restructuring them into your chosen method (Cornell, map, or chart) while the material is fresh. This keeps pace during class and builds processing while the lecture is still warm \\u2014 better than verbatim capture and better than a pretty note never revisited.\"\n      }\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Question\",\n      \"name\": \"Is it worth learning multiple methods?\",\n      \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n        \"text\": \"Yes \\u2014 but sequentially, not as a purist commitment. Master one primary method (often Cornell) for the bulk of your work, then add a second (mind maps for revision, charts for comparisons) where your material clearly calls for it. Choice is the skill: the learner who consciously matches method to content outlasts the one who insists a single layout serves everything.\"\n      }\n    }\n  ]\n}\n<\/script>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Your notes are the first draft of your study system \u2014 the raw material every other technique acts on. Yet most notes are built by muscle memory rather than choice: a page of near-verbatim text copied because that is what the last notes looked like. The evidence, and the practical experience of top students, is [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":1238,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_yoast_wpseo_focuskw":"note-taking methods compared","_yoast_wpseo_title":"Cornell, Outline, Mind Map: Note-Taking Methods Compared","_yoast_wpseo_metadesc":"Note-taking methods compared: and the evidence on which layout best supports real revision. Discover these strategies and apply them today. Proven, practical and ready to.","_yoast_wpseo_meta-robots-noindex":"","_yoast_wpseo_meta-robots-nofollow":"","_yoast_wpseo_canonical":"","_yoast_wpseo_opengraph-title":"","_yoast_wpseo_opengraph-description":"","_yoast_wpseo_opengraph-image":"","_yoast_wpseo_twitter-title":"","_yoast_wpseo_twitter-description":"","_yoast_wpseo_schema_article_type":"","_yoast_wpseo_estimated-reading-time-minutes":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1237","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-non-classe"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v26.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Cornell, Outline, Mind Map: Note-Taking Methods Compared<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Note-taking methods compared: and the evidence on which layout best supports real revision. Discover these strategies and apply them today. Proven, practical and ready to.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/note-taking-methods-compared\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cornell, Outline, Mind Map: Note-Taking Methods Compared\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Note-taking methods compared: and the evidence on which layout best supports real revision. Discover these strategies and apply them today. Proven, practical and ready to.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/note-taking-methods-compared\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Flaaash Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-10-03T07:00:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/15.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"675\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"niclaw\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"niclaw\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cornell, Outline, Mind Map: Note-Taking Methods Compared","description":"Note-taking methods compared: and the evidence on which layout best supports real revision. Discover these strategies and apply them today. Proven, practical and ready to.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/note-taking-methods-compared\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cornell, Outline, Mind Map: Note-Taking Methods Compared","og_description":"Note-taking methods compared: and the evidence on which layout best supports real revision. Discover these strategies and apply them today. Proven, practical and ready to.","og_url":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/note-taking-methods-compared\/","og_site_name":"Flaaash Blog","article_published_time":"2026-10-03T07:00:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":675,"url":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/15.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"niclaw","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"niclaw","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/note-taking-methods-compared\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/note-taking-methods-compared\/"},"author":{"name":"niclaw","@id":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/48d387d7cd6025afdeff401714a617df"},"headline":"Cornell, Outline, Mind Map: Note-Taking Methods Compared","datePublished":"2026-10-03T07:00:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/note-taking-methods-compared\/"},"wordCount":1497,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/note-taking-methods-compared\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/15.jpg","articleSection":["Non class\u00e9"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/note-taking-methods-compared\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/note-taking-methods-compared\/","url":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/note-taking-methods-compared\/","name":"Cornell, Outline, Mind Map: Note-Taking Methods Compared","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/note-taking-methods-compared\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/note-taking-methods-compared\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/15.jpg","datePublished":"2026-10-03T07:00:00+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/48d387d7cd6025afdeff401714a617df"},"description":"Note-taking methods compared: and the evidence on which layout best supports real revision. Discover these strategies and apply them today. Proven, practical and ready to.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/note-taking-methods-compared\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/note-taking-methods-compared\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/note-taking-methods-compared\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/15.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/15.jpg","width":1200,"height":675,"caption":"Cornell, Outline, Mind Map: Note-Taking Methods Compared - illustration"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/note-taking-methods-compared\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Cornell, Outline, Mind Map: Note-Taking Methods Compared"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/","name":"Flaaash Blog","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/48d387d7cd6025afdeff401714a617df","name":"niclaw","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/302cd4336af7f15f8c4d5657c4d21bebcf62390959a71f10a62f711ac877acbf?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/302cd4336af7f15f8c4d5657c4d21bebcf62390959a71f10a62f711ac877acbf?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"niclaw"},"url":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/author\/niclaw\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1237","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1237"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1237\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1452,"href":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1237\/revisions\/1452"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1238"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1237"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1237"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1237"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}