{"id":1318,"date":"2026-11-03T09:00:00","date_gmt":"2026-11-03T08:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/?p=1318"},"modified":"2026-08-26T21:01:33","modified_gmt":"2026-08-26T19:01:33","slug":"ai-summarize-textbooks","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/ai-summarize-textbooks\/","title":{"rendered":"Using AI to Summarize Textbooks Without Losing the Details"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Asking AI to &#8220;summarize this chapter&#8221; is the most common textbook use \u2014 and the most learning-destructive. The summary substitutes for engagement, and details vanish exactly as you feared. But there is a version of AI summarization that loses nothing: not replacing your reading, but structuring it, testing it, and compressing it <em>after<\/em> you have processed it. Here is how to summarize with AI without hollowing out your knowledge.<\/p>\n\n<p>Using AI to summarize textbooks is powerful, but doing it wrong destroys learning; this guide shows the safe workflow.<\/p>\n\n\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n\n\n\n<nav class=\"table-of-contents\" aria-label=\"Table of Contents\"><p><strong>Table of Contents<\/strong><\/p><ul><li><a href=\"#why-naive-summarization-fails\">Why Naive Summarization Fails<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#the-correct-sequence-read-retrieve-then-summarize\">The Correct Sequence: Read \u2192 Retrieve \u2192 Then Summarize<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#asking-for-the-right-kind-of-summary\">Asking for the Right Kind of Summary<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#turning-summaries-into-retention\">Turning Summaries Into Retention<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#a-worked-example-one-chapter-three-passes\">A Worked Example: One Chapter, Three Passes<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#where-ai-textbook-help-genuinely-shines\">Where AI Textbook Help Genuinely Shines<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#subject-specific-adjustments\">Subject-Specific Adjustments<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav>\n\n<h2 id=\"why-naive-summarization-fails\">Why Naive Summarization Fails<\/h2>\n<p>The failure has three layers:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>You skip the processing.<\/strong> A summary read in place of the chapter gives you conclusions without the reasoning that makes them stick. Memory needs the connective tissue; summaries amputate it.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Details die silently.<\/strong> AI summaries optimize for brevity, so examples, edge cases, exceptions, and secondary mechanisms disappear first. Exams love exactly what summaries cut.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Fluency illusion.<\/strong> The smooth summary feels like understanding. You recognize every sentence \u2014 recognition masquerading as recall until the exam asks you to produce what you only ever consumed.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>None of this means AI cannot help with textbooks. It means the summary must come <em>after<\/em> genuine processing, not instead of it.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"the-correct-sequence-read-retrieve-then-summarize\">The Correct Sequence: Read \u2192 Retrieve \u2192 Then Summarize<\/h2>\n<p>Restructure the workflow so AI compression happens on material you already own:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Read the chapter (or section) yourself<\/strong> at normal depth \u2014 engaging examples, attempting end-of-section questions mentally.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Close the book and write your own summary from memory<\/strong>, however rough. This retrieval step is where learning happens.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Now ask AI to summarize the same material<\/strong> and compare against yours.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Study the differences:<\/strong> what did AI include that you missed (real gaps), what did you include that AI skipped (often exam-relevant detail worth keeping), where do they contradict (verify against source).<\/li>\n<li><strong>Merge into a final master summary<\/strong> \u2014 mostly yours, corrected by the comparison.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>This sequence keeps generation on your side of the desk while using AI as a completeness check. The summary becomes a <em>product<\/em> of processed knowledge rather than a substitute for it.<\/p>\n<p>The comparison step deserves emphasis because it does double duty: it corrects your draft (fixing real gaps and errors) while training your judgment (you learn what matters in a chapter by seeing what survives compression). Students who skip straight to accepting AI&#8217;s summary lose both benefits \u2014 they receive an unexamined document instead of running the comparison loop that teaches chapter-reading itself.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"asking-for-the-right-kind-of-summary\">Asking for the Right Kind of Summary<\/h2>\n<p>When you do prompt, precision beats &#8220;summarize this&#8221;:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Structured extraction:<\/strong> &#8220;List every mechanism described, with its inputs, steps, and outcomes&#8221; preserves detail that prose summaries drop.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Layered summaries:<\/strong> ask separately for a one-paragraph overview, then a detailed outline, then a list of all key terms and definitions \u2014 three passes capture different layers.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Detail-preserving modes:<\/strong> &#8220;Summarize including all named examples, exceptions, and figures&#8221; explicitly forbids the default pruning.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Question-oriented summaries:<\/strong> &#8220;Extract everything needed to answer: [your exam questions]&#8221; aligns compression with what actually matters for you.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Comparative summaries:<\/strong> &#8220;How does this chapter&#8217;s account differ from [previous chapter\/competing theory]?&#8221; forces relational detail that standalone summaries lose.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The general principle: specify <em>what must survive<\/em> the compression, because the model&#8217;s defaults will not match your exam&#8217;s priorities.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"turning-summaries-into-retention\">Turning Summaries Into Retention<\/h2>\n<p>A perfect summary still fades unless reviewed. The pipeline that prevents that:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Convert the merged master summary into flashcards<\/strong> \u2014 definitions, mechanisms, lists, cause-effect pairs. Tools like Flaaash generate these decks from your material directly and schedule their review adaptively.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Keep the summary as a pre-review map:<\/strong> before each spaced deck session, skim the one-pager to reactivate context.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Progressive refinement:<\/strong> after each review week, tighten the summary \u2014 what once needed a page now needs five lines. Compression from memory is itself retrieval practice.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Students who run this describe textbooks differently: no longer a re-reading burden before exams but raw material already banked in deck form since week one.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"a-worked-example-one-chapter-three-passes\">A Worked Example: One Chapter, Three Passes<\/h2>\n<p>To see the method end to end, take a dense chapter (say, immunology on adaptive immunity) and run it through the sequence:<\/p>\n<p><strong>Pass 1 \u2014 Read (60 minutes).<\/strong> Normal honest reading, margin flags on confusing parts. No summarizing yet.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Pass 2 \u2014 Retrieve from memory (15 minutes).<\/strong> Book closed; write everything remembered: key cell types, their roles, the activation cascade as best recalled. This draft will be incomplete and partly wrong \u2014 both are useful.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Pass 3 \u2014 AI compare-and-merge (20 minutes).<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Prompt AI for a structured extraction: &#8220;List every cell type with its function, then the activation sequence step by step, then all named signaling molecules.&#8221;<\/li>\n<li>Compare against your memory draft: AI includes three cell types you forgot entirely (real gaps), your draft has one detail AI omitted (a named experiment your professor emphasized \u2014 keep it!), and one contradiction (verify in the textbook: AI was wrong).<\/li>\n<li>Merge into a master one-pager: mostly your phrasing, corrected by the comparison.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Pass 4 \u2014 Deck conversion (15 minutes).<\/strong> Convert the one-pager into ~25 flashcards \u2014 or generate them and prune. Start reviewing the same evening.<\/p>\n<p>Total investment beyond reading: under an hour. What survives: a self-phrased map, a verified deck, and a scheduled review system that resurfaces the material every few days until exam day. Compare with the standard alternative \u2014 rereading the chapter twice during revision week \u2014 which costs more hours, produces weaker encoding, and leaves the details exactly where this article started: lost.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"where-ai-textbook-help-genuinely-shines\">Where AI Textbook Help Genuinely Shines<\/h2>\n<p>Beyond summarization, several uses preserve learning while saving real time:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Clarifying dense passages:<\/strong> paste a paragraph you read twice without comprehension; ask for a simpler restatement or a worked analogy. Clarification after effort helps; substitution before effort hurts.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Connecting chapters:<\/strong> &#8220;How does chapter 5&#8217;s concept build on chapter 3?&#8221; produces relational maps hard to build manually under time pressure.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Generating examples:<\/strong> &#8220;Give me two fresh examples of this principle&#8221; extends abstract material toward concrete ground \u2014 then verify them.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Pre-reading orientation:<\/strong> five questions about the upcoming chapter prime prediction before exposure, improving encoding when you do read.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Terminology triage:<\/strong> extract all defined terms with definitions as a glossary starter \u2014 mechanical work AI does instantly.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Each of these leaves the cognitive core with you: reading, retrieving, connecting. That division of labor is the whole game.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"subject-specific-adjustments\">Subject-Specific Adjustments<\/h2>\n<p>Different disciplines stress the workflow differently:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>STEM textbooks:<\/strong> summaries help less than problem generation; ask AI to produce practice problems from each section&#8217;s methods and keep formulas on hand-built cards with worked steps. Conceptual summaries support the &#8220;when do I use this&#8221; layer that problem-solving requires.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Humanities:<\/strong> argument structure matters more than facts \u2014 ask for claims, evidence, and counterarguments mapped separately rather than a narrative digest, then write your own position summary from memory.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Law:<\/strong> rule-application-example is the natural card shape; have AI extract rules from cases while you build the application cards from class hypotheticals.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Medicine:<\/strong> high detail density means pruning matters most; generate per-system decks and verify pharmacology numbers manually \u2014 errors here carry real consequences.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Languages:<\/strong> summarization barely applies; use generation for grammar-pattern drills and let spaced vocabulary decks carry volume.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The workflow bends per subject but never breaks its spine: your processing first, AI&#8217;s compression second, scheduled review always.<\/p>\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-buttons is-content-justification-center is-layout-flex wp-container-core-buttons-is-layout-1 wp-block-buttons-is-layout-flex\">\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-button is-style-outline--1\"><a class=\"wp-block-button__link wp-element-button\" href=\"https:\/\/flaaash.app\">Try Flaaash Free<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-button is-style-outline--2\"><a class=\"wp-block-button__link wp-element-button\" href=\"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/list.html\">Start Learning<\/a><\/div>\n\n<\/div>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\">\n{\n  \"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\",\n  \"@type\": \"Article\",\n  \"headline\": \"Using AI to Summarize Textbooks Without Losing the Details\",\n  \"description\": \"Ai summarize textbooks: science-backed guide. Learn how it works and how to apply it today with Flaaash, your AI learning app.\",\n  \"author\": {\n    \"@type\": \"Person\",\n    \"name\": \"Nicolas Veyret\"\n  },\n  \"publisher\": {\n    \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n    \"name\": \"Flaaash\",\n    \"logo\": {\n      \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n      \"url\": \"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/logo.png\"\n    }\n  },\n  \"datePublished\": \"2026-08-25\",\n  \"mainEntityOfPage\": \"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/ai-summarize-textbooks\/\",\n  \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\"\n}\n<\/script>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\">\n{\n  \"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\",\n  \"@type\": \"FAQPage\",\n  \"mainEntity\": [\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Question\",\n      \"name\": \"Is it bad to have AI summarize my textbook chapters?\",\n      \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n        \"text\": \"Only if the summary replaces your engagement. Reading yourself, writing your own summary from memory, then using AI's version as a comparison check captures AI's speed without losing the encoding that reading-and-retrieving provides.\"\n      }\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Question\",\n      \"name\": \"Will I lose important details if I rely on AI summaries?\",\n      \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n        \"text\": \"With naive prompting, yes \\u2014 examples, exceptions, and secondary points get pruned first. Counter it by requesting structured extractions (\\\"all mechanisms with steps,\\\" \\\"all named exceptions\\\"), by studying differences between your summary and AI's, and by converting the final version into review cards covering specifics.\"\n      }\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Question\",\n      \"name\": \"What is the best single prompt for preserving detail?\",\n      \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n        \"text\": \"Ask for layered output: a brief overview followed by a detailed structured outline listing all key terms, mechanisms, examples, and exceptions. Explicitly instructing \\\"do not omit named examples or exceptions\\\" measurably changes what survives compression.\"\n      }\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Question\",\n      \"name\": \"Can I skip reading entirely if the summary is thorough?\",\n      \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n        \"text\": \"Not for courses where you must apply, analyze, or write about material. Summaries deliver conclusions without the reasoning practice that builds transferable skill. For pure fact-recognition courses the loss is smaller, but even there, retrieval practice on the material matters more than any summary's completeness.\"\n      }\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Question\",\n      \"name\": \"How do I make textbook summaries stick long-term?\",\n      \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n        \"text\": \"Convert the merged summary into flashcards and put them on spaced repetition \\u2014 Flaaash generates scheduled decks from your materials directly. The summary serves as the pre-session map; the deck does the retention work; both together keep the chapter alive from week one to exam day.\"\n      }\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Question\",\n      \"name\": \"Can I trust AI summaries for technical accuracy?\",\n      \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n        \"text\": \"Treat them as drafts requiring verification. AI handles mainstream textbook material well but errs confidently on niche details, recent developments, and complex numbers \\u2014 and a wrong card reviewed fifty times is worse than no card. Spot-check every answer against the source during your pruning pass; the comparison workflow above makes this natural rather than burdensome.\"\n      }\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Question\",\n      \"name\": \"Does this work for subjects without textbooks (lectures, papers)?\",\n      \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n        \"text\": \"Yes, with source adaptation: transcribed lectures and research papers both feed the same read-retrieve-compare-deck sequence. Papers actually benefit most \\u2014 asking AI for structured extraction of methods, findings, and limitations is faster and more complete than manual annotation, provided you verify against the paper itself.\"\n      }\n    }\n  ]\n}\n<\/script>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Asking AI to &#8220;summarize this chapter&#8221; is the most common textbook use \u2014 and the most learning-destructive. The summary substitutes for engagement, and details vanish exactly as you feared. But there is a version of AI summarization that loses nothing: not replacing your reading, but structuring it, testing it, and compressing it after you have [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":1332,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_yoast_wpseo_focuskw":"summarize textbooks","_yoast_wpseo_title":"Using AI to Summarize Textbooks Without Losing the Details","_yoast_wpseo_metadesc":"Ai to summarize textbooks: a safe summarization workflow that keeps the critical details. Discover these strategies and apply them today. Proven, practical and ready to.","_yoast_wpseo_meta-robots-noindex":"","_yoast_wpseo_meta-robots-nofollow":"","_yoast_wpseo_canonical":"","_yoast_wpseo_opengraph-title":"","_yoast_wpseo_opengraph-description":"","_yoast_wpseo_opengraph-image":"","_yoast_wpseo_twitter-title":"","_yoast_wpseo_twitter-description":"","_yoast_wpseo_schema_article_type":"","_yoast_wpseo_estimated-reading-time-minutes":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1318","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-non-classe"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v26.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Using AI to Summarize Textbooks Without Losing the Details<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Ai to summarize textbooks: a safe summarization workflow that keeps the critical details. Discover these strategies and apply them today. Proven, practical and ready to.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/ai-summarize-textbooks\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Using AI to Summarize Textbooks Without Losing the Details\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Ai to summarize textbooks: a safe summarization workflow that keeps the critical details. Discover these strategies and apply them today. Proven, practical and ready to.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/ai-summarize-textbooks\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Flaaash Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-11-03T08:00:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/cover_28.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"675\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"niclaw\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"niclaw\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Using AI to Summarize Textbooks Without Losing the Details","description":"Ai to summarize textbooks: a safe summarization workflow that keeps the critical details. Discover these strategies and apply them today. Proven, practical and ready to.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/ai-summarize-textbooks\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Using AI to Summarize Textbooks Without Losing the Details","og_description":"Ai to summarize textbooks: a safe summarization workflow that keeps the critical details. Discover these strategies and apply them today. Proven, practical and ready to.","og_url":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/ai-summarize-textbooks\/","og_site_name":"Flaaash Blog","article_published_time":"2026-11-03T08:00:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":675,"url":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/cover_28.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"niclaw","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"niclaw","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/ai-summarize-textbooks\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/ai-summarize-textbooks\/"},"author":{"name":"niclaw","@id":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/48d387d7cd6025afdeff401714a617df"},"headline":"Using AI to Summarize Textbooks Without Losing the Details","datePublished":"2026-11-03T08:00:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/ai-summarize-textbooks\/"},"wordCount":1228,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/ai-summarize-textbooks\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/cover_28.jpg","articleSection":["Non class\u00e9"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/ai-summarize-textbooks\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/ai-summarize-textbooks\/","url":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/ai-summarize-textbooks\/","name":"Using AI to Summarize Textbooks Without Losing the Details","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/ai-summarize-textbooks\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/ai-summarize-textbooks\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/cover_28.jpg","datePublished":"2026-11-03T08:00:00+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/48d387d7cd6025afdeff401714a617df"},"description":"Ai to summarize textbooks: a safe summarization workflow that keeps the critical details. Discover these strategies and apply them today. Proven, practical and ready to.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/ai-summarize-textbooks\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/ai-summarize-textbooks\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/ai-summarize-textbooks\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/cover_28.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/cover_28.jpg","width":1200,"height":675,"caption":"AI summarizing textbook with student notes"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/ai-summarize-textbooks\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Using AI to Summarize Textbooks Without Losing the Details"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/","name":"Flaaash Blog","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/48d387d7cd6025afdeff401714a617df","name":"niclaw","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/302cd4336af7f15f8c4d5657c4d21bebcf62390959a71f10a62f711ac877acbf?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/302cd4336af7f15f8c4d5657c4d21bebcf62390959a71f10a62f711ac877acbf?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"niclaw"},"url":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/author\/niclaw\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1318","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1318"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1318\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1462,"href":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1318\/revisions\/1462"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1332"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1318"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1318"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/flaaash.app\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1318"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}